In the notes about CLARR's judgment we report either the elements
we consider inaccessibility sources, and the difficulties which rise
from the choices they made and which you can meet when you-re surfing
in only text mode.
FACULTY of PSYCHOLOGY
Faculty of Psychology Home Page set at the first place thanks
to its realization by Java Script without a textual version of the links
that the script itself creates.
Among the six browsers we used, only Netscape Navigator could enter it.
INSITUTE of CIVIL TRIAL LAW
The Institute of Civil Trial Law Home Page,in tha Faculty of
Jurisprudence, set at the second place because all the 9 links
it contains are uneseful unless in a trial and errors way.
We have to say that the barriers to the navigation are very strong:
they didn-t get the six main links commented by ALT command;
they chose to use a document made by frames as the second page,so all the
links point at the same name (frames1) and this can't give any useful
information to the navigator; and then, when they used ALT command for
the three links at the end of the page, they went off the tracks because
they commented the images and not
the links associated to them.
INSTITUTE of GEOGRAPHY
Institute of Geography (CISM) Home Page, in the Faculty of
Letters and Philosophy, set at the third place because they used
frames, (three frames) without neither explanatory names nor a textual
version of the links of the site.
INSTITUTE OF PAEDIATRIC CLINIC. First chair.
Institute of Paediatric Clinic Home Page set at the forth place
because they made it using frames, (two frames) neither explanatory names
nor a textual version of the links of the site.
ANTIPOISONS CENTER.
Antipoisons Center Home Page set at the fifth place
because they used two Server Side Maps [ISMAP] with their Client Side
Maps [USEMAP] but without any comment to the links which are so little
explanatory, and not much usable.